Skip to content

Omit deployments with missing RPCs from fee table #552

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2025

Conversation

cprussin
Copy link
Contributor

@cprussin cprussin commented Jan 8, 2025

Description

Type of Change

  • New Page
  • Page update/improvement
  • Fix typo/grammar
  • Restructure/reorganize content
  • Update links/references
  • Other (please describe):

Areas Affected

Checklist

  • I ran pre-commit run --all-files to check for linting errors
  • I have reviewed my changes for clarity and accuracy
  • All links are valid and working
  • Images (if any) are properly formatted and include alt text
  • Code examples (if any) are complete and functional
  • Content follows the established style guide
  • Changes are properly formatted in Markdown
  • Preview renders correctly in development environment

Related Issues

Closes #

Additional Notes

Contributor Information

  • Name:
  • Email:

Screenshots

@cprussin cprussin requested a review from aditya520 January 8, 2025 00:40
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 8, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 8, 2025 0:46am
documentation ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 8, 2025 0:46am

@cprussin cprussin merged commit 23d20e5 into main Jan 8, 2025
5 checks passed
@cprussin cprussin deleted the cprussin/dont-blow-up-on-missing-rpc branch January 8, 2025 00:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants